Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is much better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, with a general score of 85.5 against 77.7. Both devices in this review use Android OS, but Galaxy A51 has 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version. Even being the best in this comparison, the Galaxy A51 design is just a little heavier and just a little thicker than the OPPO Find X2 Neo.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A51. Both of them have a same size screen, the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 and the same pixel density. The Galaxy A51 features just a bit bigger storage for applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a greater amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Neo's battery performance is just as good as the battery duration in Galaxy A51, although the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 48 mega-pixels resolution, the same video frame rate, the same video resolution and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.