Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Ocean |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting an 85.5 score against 83.1. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 has newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 version. The Galaxy A51 body is somewhat thinner and lighter than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, even though both of them were only released 5 months apart.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A51, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3168, a little bigger display and a higher amount of pixels per inch of display. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same resolution back camera, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a way larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos and videos, better video frame rates and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.