Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is better than OPPO Find X3 Neo's score of 76. Galaxy A51 is a just a little lighter cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Neo, but they are equally thin. Both of these devices use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X3 Neo has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A51. Both of them have a better pixels number in each display inch, exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a screen with the same size. Galaxy A51 has a bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Neo, although it has a back-facing camera with lesser MP, a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing images or videos in low-light situations and a worse (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy A51 is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.