Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's general score of 77.4. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14 version. Even though the Galaxy A51 is noticeably older than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, it's construction is a bit thinner and lighter.
Galaxy A51 has a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit lower number of pixels per inch in the display, they both have a screen with the same size.
The Galaxy A15 5G counts with a little bit better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A51, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A51 has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a lower 48 MP resolution camera and a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher video definition.
The Galaxy A15 5G features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.