Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, with an 85.5 score against 84.6. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both of them should give you the same operating system features. Galaxy A51 is an older cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, but it's somewhat lighter and thinner anyway.
Galaxy A51 and Galaxy A22 5G count with really similar screens, because although the Galaxy A22 5G has a quite lower pixels density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger display. Galaxy A51 features a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A51 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy A51 shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same resolution camera, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The Galaxy A22 5G counts with greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.