Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, having a global score of 85.5 against 79.9. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy A51 is an a lot older phone than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, but Samsung was able to make it somewhat lighter and just a little thinner.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a very superior processor than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Galaxy A25 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A51, although it has a bit inferior pixels number per inch in the screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, they both have a same size screen.
Galaxy A51 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for taking photographs or videos in low light situations, a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back facing camera with a worse 48 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
Galaxy A25 5G has just a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A51, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G features superior battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.