Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is slightly better than the Galaxy A35 5G, having a score of 85.5 against 79.4. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A51 has older 11 version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A51 is noticeably older than the Galaxy A35 5G, it's design is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter.
Galaxy A51 features a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy A35 5G has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A51, because although it has a just a little worse display density and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display.
The Galaxy A51 has a much greater memory for applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A51 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A51 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking images or video in low-light situations, a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a back-facing camera with lesser mega-pixels and a smaller sensor offering a lower image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.