Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-12-27 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, with an 85.5 score against 76.9. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS, but Galaxy A51 has the newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10. Galaxy A51 is a a little lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy A70, but they are equally thin.
The Galaxy A51 has a bit better display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy A51 has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy A51 features a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Galaxy A70 and Samsung Galaxy A51 count with incredibly similar storage capacity for games and applications, both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB and exactly the same internal storage. The Galaxy A70 has a bit better battery life than Galaxy A51, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Galaxy A51 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.