Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-12-27 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is better than the Samsung Galaxy C5, with an 85.5 score against 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy A51 design is notably newer, but thicker and heavier than Samsung Galaxy C5. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Galaxy A51 has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger screen. The Galaxy A51 features a little bit better performance than Galaxy C5. They have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A51 counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy C5, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a much higher (4K) video definition.
Galaxy A51 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.