Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | -- |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 is just a bit better than the Galaxy F23, with a overall score of 85.5 against 84.6. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A51 has an older 11 version and Galaxy F23 has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy A51 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F23. They have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Galaxy F23 and Galaxy A51 feature extremely similar screens, because although the Galaxy F23 has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2408 resolution and a little bit bigger display. Galaxy A51 features much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy F23, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A51 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A51 takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy F23, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a camera with a lower resolution. The Samsung Galaxy F23 features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.