Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A51's general score of 85.5. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding operating system features. Galaxy F62 is a newer phone than the Galaxy A51, although it's thicker and extremely heavier.
Galaxy F62's processor is very similar to the CPU in Galaxy A51, because although the Galaxy F62 has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy F62 has a slightly better display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a little larger display.
Galaxy F62 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also has a larger sensor which offers a better image and video quality, a bigger aperture and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a slightly better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a very superior battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has a 75 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.