Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2022-07-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Deep Green, Light Blue and Orange Copper |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 4000 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G52 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy M13's 81.1 overall score. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy M13 has Android 12 version. The Galaxy A51 body is just a little bit thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy M13, although it was released 3 years before.
Galaxy M13 features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A51. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. The Galaxy M13 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a little inferior count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2408px resolution and a little bit larger screen.
Galaxy A51 shoots greater videos and photos than Galaxy M13, although it has a lower resolution camera in the back and a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting photos and/or video in low-light situations. Galaxy A51 has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M13, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy M13 has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.