Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2022-04-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is better than Galaxy M53 5G, having a overall score of 85.5 against 76.7. Although the Samsung Galaxy A51 is much older and just a little thicker than the Galaxy M53 5G, it's design is still a little bit lighter. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while Galaxy M53 5G has Android 12.
Samsung Galaxy A51 features a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a bit greater screen pixel density. The Galaxy A51 has a lot better processing power than Galaxy M53 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy A51 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back camera and a tinier aperture which is worse for taking photographs in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A51 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M53 5G counts with longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.