Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-27 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 score. The Samsung Galaxy A51 body has the same thickness than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it is a little bit heavier. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has more internal storage and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy Note Fan Edition's CPU is very similar to the Galaxy A51 one, both of them have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a camera with way more mega-pixels and a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality photos.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A51 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.