Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-27 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is slightly better than the Galaxy A51, having a global score of 86.3 against 85.5. The Galaxy S10e is a lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A51, but they have the same thickness. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit better looking display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with as much storage to store more apps and games as Galaxy A51, both of them have an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and equal internal storage. Galaxy S10e has a bit better performance than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10e also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A51 features a better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a lot tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor and a back camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 29 percent more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A51, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A51. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy S10e, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy A51, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.