Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2019-12-27 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | -- |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S23's general score of 77.9. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S23 has Android 13. Galaxy A51 has a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S23, because although it has a little bit worse count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy A51 features a way better performance than Galaxy S23, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A51 takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy S23, although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images and video, a lesser mega pixels back camera and a much smaller back-facing camera sensor providing a much worse image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S23, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy A51 counts with a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy S23, because it has a 3 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.