Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-27 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is better than the Galaxy S24 FE's overall score of 76. Both devices we compare here include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has 11 version while Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy A51 is a somewhat lighter phone than the Galaxy S24 FE, but both of them are 0.31inches thick.
Galaxy A51 has a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with more cpu cores. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE features a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A51 features a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Galaxy A51 has a way better camera than Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a back facing camera with less mega-pixels and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or videos in low light environments.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy A51 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.