Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a score of 85.5, which is a bit better than Galaxy S5 Sport's score of 77.8. These phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has an older 11 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. Although the Samsung Galaxy A51 is a bit heavier than Galaxy S5 Sport, it's thinner and noticeably newer.
Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a better display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a way smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy S5 Sport features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A51, because although it has lesser CPU cores and 2 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a GPU.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A51 takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A51 also has a much higher 48 MP resolution camera, a lot bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture to take better photography in low-light situations.
The Galaxy A51 has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.