Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is much better than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having an 85.5 score against 77.6. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A51 has 11 version and Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12. Even though Samsung Galaxy A51 is older than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's body is extremely lighter and extremely thinner.
Galaxy A51 has a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A51 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a just a little greater display density.
Galaxy A51 features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a less MP back facing camera and a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light images, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a bit more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A51, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has a 1 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.