Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-12-27 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is slightly better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 85.5 score against 80.1. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy A51's body is extremely thinner and noticeably lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when both of them were released with only 3 months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A51. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Galaxy A51 counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A51 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy A51 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.