Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is a bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro, with an 85.5 score against 81. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should count with very similar OS features. Galaxy A51 is a a lot lighter and much thinner phone than the Galaxy XCover Pro, even when they were released only a couple months apart.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a screen that is very similar to the display in Galaxy A51, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a little smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little higher pixel count in each inch of display. Samsung Galaxy A51 features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a CPU that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A51 one, they have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 1 percent bigger battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A51 takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a way larger sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy A51 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.