Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A51's 85.5 global score. Both phones we are comparing here include the same Android 11 operating system. Galaxy Z Flip 3's construction is newer and thinner, but also just a little heavier than the Galaxy A51.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A51, because it has a little larger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a little higher pixel amount in each inch of display.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution. The Galaxy A51 counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A51 counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A51, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A51. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A51, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.