Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-27 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is better than Sony Xperia XZs, having an 85.5 score against 77.2. Galaxy A51's body is much newer and just a little bit thinner than the Sony Xperia XZs's, although it is also a bit heavier. The Galaxy A51 counts with a bit better performance than Sony Xperia XZs, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy A51 also has more CPU cores.
Xperia XZs counts with a display that is very similar to the screen in Galaxy A51, because although the Xperia XZs has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little higher screen density. The Sony Xperia XZs has a better camera than Galaxy A51, although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, a tinier sensor taking worse quality videos and photos and a camera with a lot worse 19 MP resolution, they both have a F2 aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A51 counts with a really longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2900mAh.
The Galaxy A51 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.