Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Blasting black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a general score of 90.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A51's global score of 85.5. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro body is notably thicker and incredibly heavier than Galaxy A51. These phones work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has the previous 10 version while Galaxy A51 has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a little bigger screen, a better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A51 counts with slightly more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a bigger aperture, better 60 fps video frame rates, a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a back camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.