Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2022-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, having a general score of 85.5 against 78.7. The Galaxy A51 design is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both devices we compare here come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has Android 12.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a just a bit greater pixels number per inch of display. Galaxy A51 has a really superior performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a lot tinier sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with better video frame rate, a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in low light situations and a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A51 features a little bit more storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has a 4650mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.