Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-12-27 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's 82.7 general score. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10. Although the Samsung Galaxy A51 and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro were released only a couple months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A51 is thinner and a little lighter.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A51, although it has a quite smaller screen, a just a bit inferior pixels amount in each inch in the screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have a 0.5 inches sensor, a camera with a 48 MP and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has higher video frame rate and a bigger camera aperture for better images and video in low light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a battery performance that is very similar to the battery performance in Galaxy A51.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.