Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, having a global score of 85.5 against 84.3. Samsung Galaxy A51's body is extremely lighter than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, but it is a lot thicker and was released many years before. Both phones we are comparing include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A51 has 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has Android 14.
Galaxy A51 has an extremely better CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A51, because it has a larger display, a lot higher resolution of 2224 x 2488 pixels and a little higher pixel density.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A51, because it has a lot higher video definition, a more megapixels back facing camera, a much bigger camera sensor and a bigger aperture. Galaxy A51 counts with just a bit more memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has a 28 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.