Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy A51, with an 87.9 score against 85.5. Despite being the best in this comparison, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro body is incredibly heavier and thicker than Galaxy A51. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version while Galaxy A51 has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A51, because although it has a little worse display density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The Galaxy A51 has much more memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A51 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with better battery life than Galaxy A51, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a lot better video quality, a back facing camera with much more mega pixels, a larger camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality and a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.