Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2023-05-09 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1400 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is a bit better than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro's 79.5 global score. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy A51 is much older than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, it's body is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has older 11 version and Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has Android 13 version.
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a better 1440 x 3200px resolution, a quite larger display and more pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy A51 features a slightly bigger storage for applications and games than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5160mAh battery size.
Galaxy A51 captures better photographs and videos than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a lot less MP back-facing camera and a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.