Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2020-07-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's general score of 78.7. Even when the Galaxy A51 and the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro were only released with a few months difference, the Galaxy A51 is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10, so it offers a lot of extra features and a performance increase.
The Galaxy A51 features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's processing unit is very similar to the Galaxy A51 one, they have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Galaxy A51 has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a back facing camera with a 48 MP and the same (4K) video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has 128 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.