Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2021-03-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro's global score of 83.4. The Samsung Galaxy A51 is an older cellphone than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, but Samsung could make it lighter and thinner anyway. Both phones in our current comparison use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should give you the same operating system features.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro and Galaxy A51 count with similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a bit less pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little larger display.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a slightly better memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A51, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with superior battery life than Galaxy A51, because it has a 29% bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy A51 features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.