Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's 82.4 overall score. These phones include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding OS features. Samsung Galaxy A51 is an older phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, but it's just a little bit thinner and lighter anyway.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a just a little worse pixels amount in each inch in the display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy A51 features much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A51 also has more internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and a way better resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy A51 costs a little more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.