Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-27 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, getting an 85.5 score against 77.1. These phones have the same Android 11 OS. The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a just a bit greater pixel quantity in each inch of display, a higher 2080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger screen.
The Galaxy A51 features a much powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A51 has a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has better battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a bigger camera aperture and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.