Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, with a score of 85.5 against 75.7. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12. The Galaxy A51 construction has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, but it's just a bit lighter.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a just a bit worse screen density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also counts with a bit larger screen. Samsung Galaxy A51 features a very superior processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Galaxy A51 features a very superior memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures, a higher resolution back-facing camera and a larger camera aperture for better low light images.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.