Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | -- |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, with an 85.5 score against 77.1. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a just a little worse display pixels density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro also counts with a quite bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much greater performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A51, because it has a lot better resolution camera in the back, a larger camera aperture to take better photos in low-light situations and a way larger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a much greater storage for apps and games than Galaxy A51, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.