Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | -- |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G's overall score of 83.1. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 has older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has Android 13 version. Galaxy A51 is a incredibly heavier cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, but both have the same thickness.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a little bit larger display, a little more pixels per screen inch and a quite better 1220 x 2710 resolution. Galaxy A51 features a much greater performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has a 28 percent more battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G captures a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a back-facing camera with a way better 200 megapixels resolution, a way bigger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.