Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-12-27 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is slightly better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, getting a overall score of 85.5 against 80.2. The Galaxy A51 body has the same thickness than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but it is just a bit lighter. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS, but Galaxy A51 has 11 version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10 version.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has more RAM. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a display that's just as good as the display in Samsung Galaxy A51, and although the ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a just a bit lower number of pixels per inch of screen, they both have a display of the same size.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 shoots clearer videos and photos than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and worse video frame rate, they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a back facing camera with a 48 mega pixels. ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A51, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a battery lifetime that is just as good as Galaxy A51's battery duration.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy A51 is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.