Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is a bit better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, with an 85.5 score against 78.1. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. Galaxy A51 is a just a little lighter phone than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but both of them are 0.31inches thick.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a display that is just as good as the display in Samsung Galaxy A51, because although the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a just a little worse screen pixel density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger display. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra captures clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a camera with lot more MP, a much better video definition and a bigger aperture to take better low-light images. The Galaxy A51 has a much bigger memory for games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A51 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 15% bigger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.