Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro is just a bit better than the Galaxy A52 5G, getting a 92.8 score against 91.3. The iPhone 12 Pro is a just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Galaxy A52 5G, even though they were only released with a few months difference. IPhone 12 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy A52 5G comes with Android 12 operating system.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a more powerful processor than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro also counts with a 64 bits processor. IPhone 12 Pro counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher screen density and a quite better resolution of 1170 x 2532px.
The Galaxy A52 5G captures greater pictures and videos than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 12 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2815mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.