Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11 | iOS 15.x |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro is slightly better than Galaxy A52 5G, with a 93.3 score against 91.3. Even though Apple iPhone 13 Pro and the Galaxy A52 5G were only released 6 months apart, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro construction is just a little bit heavier but also just a bit thinner. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy A52 5G works with Android 12 OS.
The iPhone 13 Pro has a better performance than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores , and they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a better screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel amount in each inch in the display and a quite better resolution of 1170 x 2532px.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G features a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 45 percent larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a lot better camera than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.