Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11 | iOS 15.x |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max is just a bit better than the Galaxy A52 5G, getting a 93.2 score against 91.3. IPhone 13 Pro Max's design is incredibly heavier but just a bit thinner than the Galaxy A52 5G, and both were only released with a couple months difference. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy A52 5G works with Android 12 OS.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 6 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit CPU. IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a quite greater number of pixels per inch of display, a slightly higher 1284 x 2778 resolution and a little bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much better camera than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy A52 5G features much more storage to install games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G has just a bit longer battery life than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4352mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.