Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11 | iOS 9.x |
| 2021-03-19 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a bit better than Apple iPhone 6s, having a general score of 91.3 against 83. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's construction is way newer, but somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier than Apple iPhone 6s. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has Android 12 OS, while Apple iPhone 6s works with iOS 9.x OS.
The iPhone 6s has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch, a way worse resolution of 1334 x 750 pixels and a really smaller screen. IPhone 6s has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has lesser RAM and 6 lesser and slower CPU cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a GPU.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 6s, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a camera in the back with a way better resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures in low-light environments.
Galaxy A52 5G features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 6s, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 1715mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.