Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is a little bit better than the iPhone 8 Plus, getting a general score of 91.3 against 87.1. Galaxy A52 5G is a extremely newer and just a little bit lighter phone than iPhone 8 Plus, although it is just a little thicker. The iPhone 8 Plus has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a little worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, a little bit smaller screen and a quite worse display density.
Galaxy A52 5G has more memory for games and applications than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Galaxy A52 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos and a way higher resolution camera.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior battery performance than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 2691mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.