Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is a little bit better than the Apple iPhone X's overall score of 88.1. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's design is a lot newer than Apple iPhone X's, but it is just a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. The iPhone X features just a little better processing power than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has lesser cpu cores and 3 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
IPhone X features just a bit better display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better screen density and a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution. Galaxy A52 5G features a better memory for games and applications than iPhone X, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much better 64 megapixels resolution camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.