Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the iPhone XR, getting a general score of 91.3 against 82. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a a little bit lighter cellphone than the iPhone XR, but both of them are equally thin. Apple iPhone XR features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a little smaller display, a much lower resolution of 828 x 1792 and a bit inferior pixel quantity per inch in the display.
Galaxy A52 5G has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XR, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Apple iPhone XR counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores and 3 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much longer battery duration than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much better camera than iPhone XR, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.