Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is slightly better than the iPhone XS, having a overall score of 91.3 against 84.2. Although the Galaxy A52 5G is way newer than the iPhone XS, it's just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Apple iPhone XS has a superior CPU than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has lesser RAM memory and 2 lesser processing cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone XS features a little sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1125 x 2436px resolution and a just a little better screen density. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XS, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than iPhone XS, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution and a lot bigger sensor capturing much better quality photos.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a way better battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.