Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is much better than Google Pixel's general score of 80.2. The Galaxy A52 5G design is notably newer and just a little bit thinner, but also extremely heavier than Google Pixel. Galaxy A52 5G has a little better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a bit better amount of pixels in each inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior memory for apps and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 5G features a way better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 62% more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a much larger back camera sensor, a larger diafragm aperture and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.