Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Google Pixel 2 XL, with a overall score of 91.3 against 82.5. Although Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is extremely newer than the Google Pixel 2 XL, it is just a little thicker and just a bit heavier. Google Pixel 2 XL's processor is just as good as the CPU in Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although the Google Pixel 2 XL has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Google Pixel 2 XL features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a greater display density. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a much better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a same size diafragm aperture and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a much larger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Galaxy A52 5G features better battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.