Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is better than the Google Pixel 3's overall score of 80. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a lot newer than the Google Pixel 3, it's extremely heavier and a bit thicker. Google Pixel 3 has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a greater camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot bigger camera sensor and a back camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with much more memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.