Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is better than Google Pixel 3 XL's 80.7 score. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a a lot newer phone than the Google Pixel 3 XL, although it is just a little heavier and a little bit thicker. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a greater number of pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A52 5G has better battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 31 percent bigger battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a way larger back camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality and a lot higher 64 MP resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.